I am taking a break from my "The Decline of the Japanese Music Market" series, and I regret the somewhat didactic nature of those posts. I have this kind of wikipedia sensibility about the web; in other words, we should all be writing endlessly in the public sphere on topics about which we know the most. Not necessarily because it's interesting, but because it's reference. As much as I'd like to read about Lancelot Link and the Evolution Revoluion, I can't until someone goes out of their way and altruistically writes up an article on it. (Oh look, someone did!)
I also worry that someone might glance upon this site and think that in my analysis of Jpop there is an implicit legitimization of Japanese popular music. To be honest, I don't particularly think very highly of Jpop at this point. I listened to a lot of it when I was about 17, and at that time, I had overdosed on alternative and there was something inspirational and fresh about Japanese melodies. Looking back, I regret spending too much time on Speed singles and the occasional Sharan Q cassette. This has given me great karaoke material and fodder for my anti-Tsunku rants, but once I figured out the Jpop song template, there was no reason to keep on listening. Besides some minor borrowings from contemporary music, they are still churning out the same stale product.
The Japanese music market is the 2nd biggest in the world, making up about 1/6 of the total sales. But in our minds, Japanese acts maybe make up a tiny fraction of who we consider the "international music scene." There is no crossover for mainstream acts outside of Asia, because Japanese music is totally content-less. All of the songs are just bundles of social and cultural meanings, devoid of any real music content. And when you try to take these "songs" to places where signals like visual-kei don't mean anything, of course, no one has any interest. Those bands that can make it overseas - YMO, Cornelius - are the rare content-driven exception or embraced from a kitsch angle, like Pizzicato Five.
The Japanese themselves have this kind of underdog angle in regards to their own pop culture; they don't criticize it at all and seem to get their feelings hurt when no one in the West likes it. Most American fans of Jpop try to stay positive so that they can sell it to other Westerners. I personally think that Japan should be held to the "global standard" of music and culture and that the world's #2 music-producing country shouldn't be cut any slack. If GLAY sucks, - and boy do they - someone needs to say so. And then explain why on Earth they're still on the charts year after year.
Not all Japanese music is terrible, by any means. But maybe 10% of all the released music is worth considering, and a total 1% is actually good. My reason for nitpicking at the Jpop market is that it's generally a dishonorable, archaic system, fraught with collusion and corruption, and just like anywhere, the real talent is buried in the graveyards of the "un-marketable." My attacks are not driven by cynicism, but by the hope that knowing about the system will help us defeat it.
And with the American music charts starting to clutter with hordes of teen pop and cookie-cutter urban music, we may just be able to apply our lessons of #2 to #1.