« Les Maisons des Nouveaux Riches | Main | Meanwhile on the Other Coast... »

April 3, 2005

L.A. Times

My blog somehow is featured in this Sunday's L.A. Times Arts & Entertainment section (full-article for subscribers only - natch.) I'm depicted as an underwhelming wealth of information on "Japanese and American cultural differences" - a reference perhaps to my eight-part series on "What is the Deal with Chopsticks?" The best part is that the article concludes that the upbeat Onyanko Club song "O-yoshi ni natte ne TEACHER" and the dark "Don't Stand So Close to Me" by the Police are essentially the same song, once-and-for-all proving my blog to be superfluous.

But who can say no to publicity?

Posted by marxy at April 3, 2005 8:05 PM

Comments

Congratulations! Feels good when the media gets you wrong or quotes you out of context doesnt it? If I ever meet you IRL, ask me abut O Shupansha.

Posted by: Chris_B at April 3, 2005 11:58 PM


As the old saw goes, don't worry about reporters say, just make sure they spell your name right.

Posted by: sparkligbeatnic at April 4, 2005 1:48 AM

Bottom line is that by having the LA Times do an article on your Blog, you are receiving free publicity and bringing you new visitors. And for those of us interested in Japanese Pop Culture of today, we will continue to turn to your Blog as a source of information. Back in the late 1970's, I hitch-hiked from one end of Japan to the other end, and the little incidents along the way reflected much about Japanese culture at that time. The blogging technology of today allows one to share and discuss such experiences among a world-wide audience.

Posted by: Curt at April 4, 2005 2:45 AM

I love it! When you click on the link it sends you to this page:::

>The content you requested is reserved for
>calendarlive.com members only.
>Membership is FREE for Los Angeles Times
>7-day newspaper subscribers.*
>
>
>Don't just sit there. Do something.
>

What is that last part about? Is it supposed to be interpreted as something in the vein of "workers of the world unite!" or does it mean "Buy this paper" ???

There doesn't seem to be any reason for them to be using a "decorative rebellious" phrase... Its not like they are marketing to campus radicals or Good Charlotte fans or anything...

So what's going on??? Is advertizing really so far along that we are expected to assume that any "activist" phrase is not only OK for commercialization, but that this doesn't even have to be in any sort of context?

Drink New Dakara - Fuck the Police.

And has everyone seen the New York Times Magazine? You can see it for free for a few more days, as long as you give them your super-private information... But I guess it is "Japan Theme"...

Posted by: farley at April 6, 2005 6:21 AM

try this,
If you don't have a password to login New York Times, try member ID "gwbisaterrorist" with password "gwbisaterrorist"
best,
r.

Posted by: r. at April 6, 2005 7:09 AM