« How Did Japanese Analysts Make Money Before the Rise of Poor People? | Main | On the New Japanese Tokion »

September 14, 2006

Marxy Music News: New Album(s)

volunteers.jpg

For those keeping score (and hopefully listening on the sly), I released my debut (mini)album Kyoshu Nostalgia back in January 2005. I essentially finished the album back in November 2003, so it was an antsy, drawn-out process waiting to get it all cleaned up and ready to go to market. This lag, however, cannot hold a candle to my sluggish progress with the new work.

Waiting for Kyoshu to be released, I took the summer of 2004 to pump out a large number of demos and by the end of the year had finished a rough draft of a new album - right as my debut came out in round plastic form. Early on, I decided that I wanted this new project to avoid any "fake" (virtual, sampled) instruments and actually use live recordings, so I went into a studio to track drums with my drum hero Mike Blaugrund in Brooklyn in September 2005. Then all of my files were transferred to my mixing engineer in Queens, and I went back to Tokyo to redo all the bass parts to match the new drum tracks, etc. To get a sense of my pace, I took about a month to practice all the bass parts before I even committed them to hard drive space. I also added two or three new songs to give the album more of a conceptual framework.

After a year of the album being in non-mixed limbo, I am coming close to completing all the grunt work on my side - lots of boring adjustments and fixes that will make the album about 5% better than the original demos - and then the real mixing goes into full gear, which for my albums and their "conceptual panning" and unwise attempts to recreate early stages of technological progress, may take a while. I can say that in terms of audio fidelity, the demos were already legions beyond Kyoshu, although I still seem to leave a crust of bedroom atmospherics on all of the tracks.

Looks like I have a superfantastic label lined up, but there are at least three artists in line in front of me. I guess the currently-untitled Neomarxisme II will come out around February 2007. These album things take awhile. For me at least.

I have been recently listening to the mp3 demos in my preferred sequence order, and I have to say that I really, really like what I have. Instead of breaking song structure conventions so brazenly like last time, the experimentations are more internalized and natural. Choruses and verses are still smashed together from different galaxies, but this time, the juxtaposition itself takes on a meaning. I also let the songs breathe a little more - breaking my four-minute rule - but they deserve the extra time. Other clues to the sound: less soft rock, more raw synth sounds, less cluttered production, way more harpsichord, real piano, more melodic repetition, a overarching lyrical theme, better Japanese lyrics, more punch, way more guitar.

Since this will not be coming out for a while, I have decided to do a free EP based on outtakes and scraps that did not make the final cut - mostly removed because the songs did not mesh with the overall flow. Getting these disparate parts to fit into an EP, however, has been a challenge, and I ended up recording three new songs to get everything to work. I hope to get this out within the month on creation-centre.com, and although it is substantially more low key and minimal than the new album, I think it should be an interesting twelve minutes worth of music. I implore you to listen when the time comes.

Posted by marxy at September 14, 2006 5:57 PM

Comments

I'm hyped. Your last album was good (if short) and your mixes with Ki5i have been fantastic. Be sure to blog all the details as they occur.

Posted by: Carl at September 14, 2006 7:00 PM

this is super good news.

Posted by: odot at September 14, 2006 7:21 PM

I feel like one song on the free EP is a bit "olamm"-esque although no where near as good.

Posted by: marxy at September 14, 2006 7:22 PM

Can't wait, for both the album and the free EP!
Viva creation-centre!

Posted by: Patrick at September 14, 2006 7:24 PM

Wow, that's so not the way I work! I slam a track out in a day, usually. I couldn't bear to spend months on a bass part, I'd just stop hearing the song after a while. The details would eclipse the whole, the trees would wipe out the wood.

I decided that I wanted this new project to avoid any "fake" (virtual, sampled) instruments and actually use live recordings, so I went into a studio to track drums... Instead of breaking song structure conventions so brazenly like last time, the experimentations are more internalized and natural... less cluttered production, way more harpsichord, real piano, more melodic repetition, a overarching lyrical theme, better Japanese lyrics, more punch, way more guitar.

I always find people's explanations of how their sound evolves fascinating. This account suggests you're getting more "mature" or more "conservative" in your production style. It's vaguely rockist, because it appeals to "nature" (both in the "real" instruments used and the "natural" structural juxtapositions), although in music what people tend to mean when they say "nature" is convention -- what sounds natural is what we're used to.

My feeling is that artists always think they're getting better with time, but that the public usually likes what the artist did early on better, even if that was more lo-fi. In other words, charm and originality are more important than care with details and getting a bit more "natural" (in other words samey). It may be that people prefer the rushed EP to the laborious LP. It's good that you're doing both, anyway.

Posted by: Momus at September 14, 2006 7:55 PM

Can we expect keytar solos?

Very. long. keytar solos?

Posted by: check at September 14, 2006 11:09 PM

Looking forward to that !

Digiki album coming out in March 2007 WATCH OUT !

Posted by: Digiki at September 15, 2006 1:51 AM

as the mix engineer in qns. i wrote alot of crap, and now deleted it. and i'm going to write this.


"mate, sometimes, you know, it is made so hard" (i'm looking righ at you momus)

Posted by: trevor at September 15, 2006 3:41 AM

Wow, that's so not the way I work! I slam a track out in a day, usually.

I get the song done in two days, get busy with something else, and then spend eight agonizing months trying to fight the inertia to clean up all the little mistakes. I really dislike this way of working and I think I will approach the next thing much differently.

It's vaguely rockist, because it appeals to "nature"

I still do so much cut-ups and editing and artificial noises that I wouldn't call it rockist or naturalist, but I just want the sounds to sound bold and real. A lot of people may not claim to care about whether sounds are fake or not but they can subconsciously tell.

My feeling is that artists always think they're getting better with time, but that the public usually likes what the artist did early on better

That's the great fear as a young artist - will maturity make me more interesting and better focused or boring?

Posted by: marxy at September 15, 2006 10:57 AM

marxy sed A lot of people may not claim to care about whether sounds are fake or not but they can subconsciously tell.

Depends on alot of things but you have a much kinder estimate of "alot of people" than I. Its been my experience that most people only "hear" if they like something or not and quite often its the mastering mix not the main mixdown that determines much of that. Of course I'm asuming at least a semi competant mixdown engineer. BTW if you are keeping it real this time around, can we assume that there is indeed a harpsichord at chez marxy?

momus: by "track a day" do you mean writing, recording or both?

m&M both use lyrics in their music, a process which I simply cant do myself. I take between a day and a month to "finish" a track and sometimes tracks wll sit there for two months till I find the last set of whatever is needed to finish em. Sometimes I get really lucky and do final mixes of several tracks in one day.

Odd thing is that as a consumer listener, I tend to assume that when an album comes out the music is new, even though I know from the experience of recording, mixing, mastering, pressing, packaging, and then finally distribution, that by the time music gets into the consumers hands it may indeed be years old.

Anyways marxy good luck on the upcoming release.

Posted by: Chris_B at September 15, 2006 1:01 PM

by "track a day" do you mean writing, recording or both?

Sometimes both. But it's always hard to quantify how long a song "takes to make", since songs are like sushi: okay, it may just take one chop to make one, but in that chop is a lifetime of experience, training, and, well, chops.

Posted by: Momus at September 15, 2006 1:59 PM

I think speed is a product of experience and skill, no?

Or a youthful naivete.

Posted by: marxy at September 15, 2006 2:07 PM

m&M you are both right, sorta... By the other view, songs are like a bowel movement, even a baby can do it but sometimes it takes an adult quite a while.

Posted by: Chris_B at September 15, 2006 4:26 PM

I think I prefer the sushi metaphor to the shit metaphor myself.

Posted by: Momus at September 15, 2006 8:07 PM

Look forward to it, and hope it's a bit easier to get hold of than KN - I had completely forgotten I'd ordered it by the time it arrived 10 months later!

Posted by: bobince at September 16, 2006 12:09 AM

I am sorry that happened.

Posted by: marxy at September 16, 2006 12:20 AM

Y'all are so cute when you get along!

Posted by: farley at September 16, 2006 1:07 AM

m&M was a great rendering, Chris_B.

Looking forward to the tunes, David.

Posted by: graham at September 16, 2006 4:07 PM

What's this I hear about a new group called m&M? Are you two really doing a collaboration for the next music project? That's so great. Many people will be happy to hear that.

Posted by: davido at September 17, 2006 11:57 PM

the currently-untitled Neomarxisme II

now that'd be one marxist title. the arts must serve the perpetual revolution. (the album must serve the (post)blog)

Posted by: alin at September 18, 2006 5:47 AM

question for m&M: What instruments do you guys play yourselves?

Posted by: Chris_B at September 18, 2006 1:13 PM

I grew up playing guitar and baritone ukelele. I can play piano although not well, but it means I can play anything keyboard based. I have gotten better at bass lately, but still don't have it. I am not really a drummer, but I "get" it.

Posted by: marxy at September 18, 2006 2:11 PM

I suppose acoustic guitar is what I'm best at, in a sort of arpeggiated Leonard Cohen style. There's quite a bit of that on my new album, mixed in with the electronics. I can busk stuff on the keyboards, enough to play chord sequences into a sequencer. But I'd say my main instrument now is laptop, just all the things you can do to manipulate sound, sampling stuff and messing around with it. There's some ukelele on my record too, but it's all sampled from George Formby records!

Posted by: Momus at September 18, 2006 11:19 PM

you can make records much faster when you sample stuff. since that stuff has already been recorded.. compressed. mix. mastered.. most of the "work" is already done..

Posted by: trevor at September 19, 2006 1:44 AM

trevor, for me thats when the work actually starts!

Posted by: Chris_B at September 20, 2006 8:43 PM